iViewit Digital Video and Imaging Patent Pending Technologies STOLEN, a Decade and Counting.

Time for Accountability for Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm, Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, IBM, Bruce Sewell, Jeffrey Bewkes, Paul Otellini, Time Warner Inc. , AOL ... and ALL involved in the Stealing of a the iViewit Technology that We all Use in Our Every Day Life.

Proskauer Rose Stole a 13 Trillion Dollar technology originally through a Corrupt U.S. Bankruptcy Court Preceding and Hid this Technology in Patent Pooling Schemes withMPEG LA via Proskauer Rose Corrupt Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein.

This Technology is Now Used by Time Warner Inc., Clearwire Corporation, Intel Corp. , Lockheed Martin, Verizon, Apple, Nokia, Motorola, IBM, and Well anyone who uses ModernHigh Speed Video Technology.

Once iViewit Technologies issues a Cease and Desist that is Up Held by a Non-Proskauer Rose Controlled Court - Well 95% of all Cable TV, Video on Phones, Internet Video ... Will Come to an Abrupt Halt UNTIL they can Negotiate with iViewit Technologies.

Time Warner Inc. Has Signed Agreements and non-compete agreements with the iViewit Technologies and IGNORED these Signed - Binding Contracts.

Time Warner Inc. - CEO Jeffrey Bewkes has known for a very long time that Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., and AOL will face Massive Liabilities over the iViewit Technology they STOLE. Yet Time Warner Inc. - CEO Jeffrey Bewkes Continues to Ignore this Fact and Time Warner Inc. - CEO Jeffrey Bewkes continues to Fail to Disclose to the "Board of Directors".

Intel Corp. Knows Full Well they Screwed over Iviewit Technologies and Intel CEO Paul Otellini, as Well as Ex-Intel General Counsel Bruce Sewell Have Known and NOT Disclosed this Massive Shareholder Fraud.

Even though there is Massive Criminal Complaints Filed, There is over 1200 documents of proof online at Iviewit.TV, there is Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney GeneralNowGovernor Andrew Cuomo over the Stolen Iviewit Technology, there is a Federal RICO Lawsuit, and a VERY Detailed SEC Complaint.

And for Now Intel Corp, Time Warner Inc., Apple, IBM, Lockheed Martin, Clearwire Corp., and More seem to be able to STOP massive action against them in the Iviewit Case. This will NOT continue much longer, their corruption and cover up is OVER. The Truth is Roaring and it is Simply a matter of time.

Resources To Research the Stolen Iviewit Technology in more detail

https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9&pli=1

iViewit SEC Complaint

http://www.ceopaulotellini.com/

Intel Corp. CEO

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

Time Warner Inc. CEO

http://www.stolentechnology.com/2010/12/criminal-complaint-against-nyag-andrew.html

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

http://www.brucesewell.com/

http://www.kennethrubenstein.com/

Corrupt Proskauer Rose Lawyer - MPEG LA

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/2010/02/warner-bros-signed-non-disclosure.html

posted Here by

Investigative Blogger

Crystal L.Cox

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...

FTC, FBI, SEC, State Attorney Generals, DOJ, ALL Ignore Intel Corp. Monopolies - RICO Violations, Sherman and Clayton Act Violations and More

Intel Corp. Monopoly

more at
CEOpaulOtellini.com

Read more...

CEO Paul Otellini Intel Corp. Continues to Ignore the Truth about Intel Corp

Intel Corruption - CEO Paul Otellini Corruption

Read more...

Proof of Massive Fraud at Intel Corp. - Intel CEO Paul Otellini is Covering Mass Corruption

Click Here for Detailed Report on How bad Intel Corruption Is.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/51737284/
Proof-Of-Intel-Cartel---RICO-Proof

Read more...

Intel Multi-Trillion Dollar Fraud Over Stolen Iviewit Technology - White Collar Crime Complaint to SEC.

CEO of Intel Paul Otellini KNOWS of Mass Fraud on Shareholders and DOES Not Disclose to Intel Corp. Board, Auditors or Shareholders.


"" SEC COMPLAINT INTEL CORPORATION Page 2 of 8

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Re: Complaint - Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel

White Collar Crime Division and Any and All Compliance Division Heads and Related
Offices:

I, Eliot Bernstein, of 2753 NW 34th Street, Boca Raton, Florida 33434 as the
Original Owner and Inventor of key "backbone technologies" for video and imaging as
further described herein, am filing this formal complaint against Intel Corporation ( Intel ) with United States headquarters located at 2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Ca, 95054-1459, and bring to your attention ongoing investigations involving multiple federal offices around the country as well as International investigations pertinent in this matter.

Intel is a primary wrongdoer as a named defendant in a presently pending Trillion
Dollar international RICO conspiracy lawsuit1 involving the theft and fraud of my
Intellectual Property rights as further set out herein. In addition to liabilities claimed in this lawsuit, are separate direct primary liabilities and obligations from signed agreements including Non Disclosure’s, Strategic Partner Agreements and Licensing Agreements.

Further, on information and belief Intel corporate management including at least the
President, Paul S. Otellini and corporate counsel Bruce D. Sewell, and Stephen R.
Rodgers are also involved in an ongoing and undisclosed massive international Fraud
against the Intel shareholders and investors.

Upon information and belief, the frauds include but are not limited to the failure
to disclose both the lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringements in direct violation of various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for disclosing liabilities and more. Merely one claim in this lawsuit involves the attempted Murder upon my family by an Iraqi style car bombing that blew up three vehicles in addition to mine during the early phases of the high stakes corporate theft and fraud of my Intellectual Property rights. Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to this as a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case2."

Full Document and Source
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court
%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

Read more...

Intel FTC - Statement From Mike Bruzzone FTC TA Operating in Civic Service Capacity. Intel Docket 9341

Intel FTC

"" September 7, 2010

To: Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Fm: Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing
FTC TA Operating in Civic Service Capacity

Re: FTC v Intel Docket 9341 Public Comment
Nation Interest Publication version 3.12

Here's my FTC v Intel 9341 public comment.

You may have noticed Intel, and the Intel Communications herd, quickly followed August 4, 2010 FTC announcement of finalizing 9341 Proposed consent agreement . . . as the confirmed settlement.

Which of course is not true pending Commissioner public comment review, and then potential ratification of proposed consent agreement in all or part.

I believe the consent agreement will be accepted in part and denied in part.

Honest, even for me from industry, I have never witnessed Intel comms spreading so much disinformation so quickly on August 4.

Also believe Senate and Congressional Committee's on Commerce are watching this outcome; as a potential regulatory breakdown. We'll get to see just how with it, or out of it, Wash DC is with this outcome. We know it bad . . . but can it show worse?

If the proposal is not accepted . . . that is a hopeful indicator toward governance & regulatory fiduciary responsibility

Obviously the FTC had a hand in this misrepresented settlement pitch. A little premature for Chairman Leibowtiz, Counsel Brill and Bureau of Competition Director Feinstein to be swept up with Intel Network to position the matter as settled . . . when in fact settlement is pending Commissioner ratification and they all know this . . .

There's an FTC video of the August 4 proposed consent agreement press conference . . . and oh was that an Intel celebration.

Perhaps the Chairman is a little bite more cunning?

Perhaps Intel Network and comms herd are about to experience a severe conceptual discontinuity; Commissioner non acceptance of consent order as proposed.

That would be fateful twist.

And I would think spark the legitimate press to lead in legitimate counterpoint response.

Mike Bruzzone

Summary Overview of 9341 proposed consent agreement; attached in full:

That entering into Bureau of Competition Docket 9341 proposed consent agreement with Intel Corporation would enable continued monopolization and non address of standing violations of Federal Law including antitrust, commerce and trade, racketeering, penal and securities law by the Federal Trade Commission.

Proposed consent agreement should be partially accepted for plaintiff sales relief and partially denied for antitrust omissions.

Chartered to act under the laws of the Unites States Bureau of Competition Docket 9341 negotiated settlement proposal in current form is insufficient on antitrust environmental circumstances of fact, discovery, law precedent and Commission fiduciary responsibilities.

And should be sent back to the negotiating table where the future of democratic capitalism and civil society are truly at stake.

We cannot overlook all the major Intel Network System crimes or the fiduciary and governance breakdowns which proposed order omits.

Including seven of the most hideous system crime categories;

1) Vertical by horizontal tying.

2) Intel multiple laterals of combination.

3) Intel tied charge through channels metering devices.

4) Intel Corporate plus Media tied sales attraction.

5) Network political & jurist multipoint and consumer manipulations.

6) Intel Insider Quanda stock and market rigging systems.

7) Microsoft OS horizontally tied by OEM license to Intel below cost product.

These seven categories of Intel systems deliver debilitating tendencies.

System, social, and financial consequence’s on competition, enterprise, industry, regulatory, law enforcement and protection, political body, Nation’s stability, financial markets and capital creation potential.

And continue to perpetuate hurdles in the way of system remedies from over 18 years of not owing up to many Intel and Microsoft Antitrust Violations, and concealing PC Media system crimes that have destroyed industries, competition and legitimate governance functions.

Accordingly back too the negotiating table. Docket 9341 should proceed too FTC hearing stage focused on Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 per se condemnations of law known under Section 5 umbrella which is Docket 9341.

FTC Focus -

1) Competitor limiting by vertical restraints for multiple laterals of combination.

2) Limited by horizontal contract in combinations including conspiracy to conceal.

3) In combinations cartel routing & price fixing raising consumer PC price by 6%.

4) In combinations monopoly price impact on consumers from media manipulation.

5) Validate recovery for consumer monopoly price, routing & price fixing harms.

Finally, for Docket 9341 in hearing too verify the criminal components of these competition case matters in proceeding transcript for Department of Justice timely follow on complaint;

DOJ Focus -

1) Recovering consumer monopoly price, product routing and price fixing harms.

2) Prosecuting competition, commercial frauds and racketeering that are criminal

components of the FTC Docket 9341 competition case violation’s themselves.

SEC Focus –

1) Documenting Accounting Fraud and with DOJ prosecuting Stock Market Rig.

In Summary -

Any ruling away from complete documentation of Docket 9341 case facts, in open proceedings, would deny the United States, American People, elected representatives in Congress and Senate the knowledge reference to act on the complete set of case facts.

Complete assessment of proposed order and included oversight clauses attached.

Regards,

Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy ""

Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission - In the Matter of Intel Corporation FTC Docket 9341

See Link Below for More Information
http://www.ceopaulotellini.com/2010/09/commissioners-of-federal-trade.html

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
my Blog on Intel Corruption

Intel FTC

FTC 9341

Read more...

Your Government, your "Officials" KNOW and they aid and abet Intel Corp.

" Honorable Commissioners, Senators, Congressmen, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Vice President Joseph Biden:

Pursuant to Camp Marketing Consultancy ongoing Intel Network case assessment: Consumer recoverable Intel Inside transport charge, monopoly price premium, industry monopolization on Intel economic and financial analysis grows total intent to monopolize recovery, by 12%, to $88 billion.

Monopoly recovery estimate is based on two investigative tracks. First, Intel monopoly system metric applied to Intel sales revenues on manufacturing estimates of Intel microprocessor quantities, per quarter, by Micro Design Resource. Second, sorting out Intel monopoly system expenses misrepresented as legitimate costs within Intel financials.

Data analysis parallels FTC Docket 9341 time frame and covers day one on January 1, 1999 through mid 2004 on production; extending to 2006 on Intel financials.

For the purpose of optimizing in period recovery estimate, data from both investigative tracks are SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys
relied.

Findings include proofs and pointers of RICO, enterprise network corruption and Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 per se condemnations of law.

Findings are submitted to FTC, U.S. DOJ Antitrust, DOJ Criminal and Consumer Fraud, New York State DOJ for follow on discovery from Intel Network.

Revision 5.1 of this briefing updates State Attorney Generals on particulars of the case matters.

Is meant by this case steward; the Relator original source, too solicit counsel for False Claims Act recovery of fraudulent and monopoly costs imposed on Federal government’s Intel microprocessor based computer purchases.

This analyst believes FCA is now proven on weight of Intel false statements to conceal. Monopoly and fraudulent costs imposed on Federal government and related GSA computer procurement claims.

Further this analyst encourages dialogue between State Attorney Generals and U.S. Attorneys for establishing a coalition to recover consumer harms, in each State, which can be calculated by the domestic ‘Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area’ subset of what is a worldwide consumer recovery value.

Make sure your State and Federal District get its actual share of the consumer recovery in relation to not calculating this amount subject to worldwide distribution.

Recover the transport charge ‘kick back’ value stolen by Intel Network, from general consumers within your State and Federal buyers within your District, and not a penny less.

To estimate the recovery in your own State House and Federal Building: 1) go to the IT Department; 2) find out how many Intel based PCs have been purchased and deployed their annually since May 1993; 3) multiply that amount by $25.50 each to determine your combined Federal Building and State House recovery values. "

Is your State Attorney FLAT out Ignoring this 18 Years of Proof? Why? Who is paying off these guys and making you pay the price ?

So what is ... "" Honorable Commissioners, Senators, Congressmen, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Vice President Joseph Biden"" Doing about the Intel Fraud that they Flat Out Know About? Contact them and Ask...

Source:
Document on Top of
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

Read more...

Intel Swallows ALL Competition whether They Like it or not..

And News like the Press Release Below makes YOU think Wow, invest in Intel Corp. - they are doing so well.. yet behind closed doors.. secret meetings.. bullying.. Economic Terrorism is happening and these companies that COULD have brought you a better product at a better PRICE.. well not know as intel NOW brings you the PRODUCT at the Price they Say..

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE67Q3J820100827

Read more...

Intel consumer & industrial monopoly recoverable grows to $88 billion

$88 Billion and Still the FTC, DOJ, SEC, FBI and your States Attorney general as well as countless Corrupt Law Firms, Corrupt Attorneys, Corrupt Judges - they all stand by knowingly whil the Super Power Intel Corp. Continues their Rampage on Inventors, Shareholders, investors, Smaller Companies... and there Seems to Be nothing that can be done about it as YOUR "Investigators" don't have the Moxy to Stand up to Intel Nation and the SUPER Power - the Wall of Corruption that Intel has been able to Pull off for at Least 18 years...

Read the Full Document at the Top of the Blog
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com - Read the Iviewit SEC Complaint at that Same Blog Exposing the Corruption of General Counsel Bruce Sewell and the Intel Corp. Mafia. Major Documents, Decades of Proof... ALL the Right People KNOW and Nothing Can Be Done? Are you Kidding?

Read more...

Intel Cartel. Intel Competition Case. Intel Monopoly. Intel Corp. Corruption

Intel Power Point - Intel RICO Proof.

Read more...

Intel Monopoly - Corruption - Cartel. Intel FTC Docket. Intel Competition Case

Click Here for Intel FTC Docket

Got an Intel Corp. Corruption Tip?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...

Intel Has been EXPOSED to ALL the "Proper" Authorities for Over a Decade.

Intel Corp. and the Intel Cartel - Intel RICO Proof - Intel's Monopoly Tactics.. THIS is No Secret - It is Common Knowledge among those who are SUPPOSE to Protect Consumers, Investors, VICTIMS of Intel's Crimes.

It is Pretty Obvious to Me that the SEC, DOJ, FTC, USPTO, FBI and more "Officials" have been aware of Intel's Monopoly and well.. the Intel Mafai .. if there were Good Guys and Gals who Knew .. well I doubt that they Could Do ANYTHING about it as .. well a Wall of Corruption is Un-Stoppable or So it Seems.. however Now we have the Internet. . I Use their Intel Chip Cartel to EXPOSE them to YOU and let you know that YOUR being DUPED.. lied to.. cheated and well the FTC, SEC, DOJ, FBI .. well they ALL know.. and have for a LONG time..

As I was saying if there were those who wanted to tell you.. well htey feared Economic Terrorism.. Death Threats.. Family Threats.. and other Stuff.. that would Blow your Mind. .their Corruption Tactics are Sick.. and quite Tricky and utilize ALL branches of YOUR Judicial System.. Someone Can Be Bought Off .. Everywhere...

The Intel Network is extensive in terms of damage control and manipulating politicians, judges, SEC investigators.. and well pretty much everybody.. Do NOT Dare Cross Intel Nation !!!

I BELIEVE that Intel even controls the State Bar, Ethics Committees, Attorney Generals, Supreme Court Judges and Patent Officers at the USPTO...

And Well.. I Believe that movies like "the Jury" well .. I believe Intel buys Juries ALSO .. but hey what do I know .. I have NO Stocks.. I have no background in finance.. ALL I got .. is Well the Ability to READ and THINK for myself.. with that.. Well the Truth is Pretty Obvious..

It Seems there is A whole lot more trouble coming on all this as the next couple of months could be telling if teh FTC denies 9341 proposed consent proposal; in part at the very least. Or if SEC follows through. Or if DOJ follows through . . . or Senate or Congressional committees on commerce.

Will Intel every Admit their Flat out Fraud, Deceit, Negligence, or will Intel ever come clean on how they frame - set up those who write the TRUTH on Intel.. even if your Tax Dollars pay for that TRUTH ??

Defamation Lawsuits in the Billions Coming SOON to Intel Shareholders.. Proof is Soon to Role Out on Who at Intel Deliberately Ruined the Lives and Careers of Analysts and investigators that wrote TRUTH Reports on the Real CRIMES of Intel..

At that to the Trillions Intel Shareholders WILL Soon Pay over the Iviewit Stolen Technology and Bruce Sewell - Paul Otellini Knowing ALL along..

Add that to every state suing Intel for MONEY Back in Rebate and Bundling Scams.. and well a whole lot more.. and Well looks Like Intel Stock is About to be. .Worthless....

Oh JUST MY Opinion....

Funny when these Brave Men and Woman tell the Truth on Intel.. and Intel Bully's them.. Threatens them.. defames them.. WELL they demand justice.. THEY get a Good Lawyer.. RIGHT? Not.. as well Intel Controls the State Bar Right? the Judges Right? YOU get no Fair Trial when in Court with the Intel Mafia.

and Often Times well Intel and their Big Ol' Corrupt Check Book pays of YOUR attorney.. and well they even have been known to shut down the law firm and disappear.. so Paid off or ???

Intel Capital Corporation has even been known to bug the homes of these Investigators hired by your TAX Dollars.. Talk About Corrupt.. Talk about a War Zone.. all for Intel Corp. wanting to STOP you from getting a better product at a better price...

Oh and in Santa Clara County well Intel Nation Owns the Entire Judicial Branch.. IN MY OPINION.. and so Justice.. NOT even a Chance at That..

Intel Corp. in Santa Clara County SEEMS to Own the Superior Court Judges and well you have NO Rights. .the Truth is Absolutely Irrelevant and LAWS do NOT matter unless they cna be Enforced and When Up against the Intel Cartel - Well there is NO way to ENFORCE laws.. unless you want to be poor, tortured, harassed, or dead... oh Just in My Thinking and in my Opinion as well . .a Hick from the Stick.. WHO don't know much bout' this Here .. Intel - Technology Market Stuff...

Got a Tip on the Intel Mafia?
What has Intel Corp. Done to Silence YOU ?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...

Pixar interested in Posts on Real 3D - Intel and Iviewit Technologies

Emeryville, California,
Pixar is very interesting in this Link
http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/2009/12/real-3d-inc-intel-silicon-graphics-inc.html

Intel Corp. acquired .. STOLE Real 3D right? and Didn't Real 3D steal the Iviewit Technology with the Help of Corrupt Patent Attorney Law Firm Proskauer Rose? And doesn't Intel Chips now have Iviewit Stolen Intellectual property on all of them?

Read more...

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC and FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro, against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, and

SEC Complaint Filed, is the SEC Listening .. It Does not sound like it. The SEC must be covering up for Favors owed, covering and protecting billionair tech companies and Above the Law Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner and Proskauer Rose.

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner.

"" March 14, 2010 --

FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI
RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS

Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years & allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTThe SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010,

“Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGIA SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.

The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT

Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing & Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan & the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.

Anderson’s testimony http://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htmhttp://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165

HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERSThe House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY. Proskauer Rose.

Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC & FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees.

Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer has further direct ties to both the Madoff & Dreier Ponzis.NY Attorney General CuomoFollowing the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).

As the Iviewit & Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.

Anderson’s filing http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf

Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Cuomo @http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdfhttp://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf

The US District CourtWith Anderson’s revelations in the US District Court & the Jury finding that her 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech regarding Whistleblower Allegations had been violated, the whole case has been called into question & further questioned due to the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION of the NY AG Cuomo’s office. Based on Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Officials, Anderson filed for an entirely new hearing based on the Cuomo’s mass conflicts. Iviewit alleges that NY AG Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Defendants, Officially & Personally, violates his office duties & obligations of honest services to NY, public office rules and violates state & federal laws, whereby the Conflicts of Interest act to block investigation of the State Defendants fingered by Whistleblower Anderson & in Iviewit’s suit, causing Obstruction of Justice through Fraud on the Court. Serious allegations for Cuomo who continues to illegally represent State Officials on public funds, while failing to investigate those same public officials, including former NY Chief Judge Judith Kaye.

Also of concern is if these massive liabilities have been reported to State Auditors by Cuomo?The US 2nd CircuitIn the US Second Circuit, Iviewit filed a “Motion to Compel” compelling that court to follow law, as with Anderson’s revelations exposing court members, that court has tried to ILLEGALLY Dismiss all the legally “related” cases to Anderson in attempts to bury them & keep the lids on the scandal that may lead them to exchange their legal robes for prison garb. Motion to Compel

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf ""

"Addressed to:
SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder

Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke

US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser
Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner

USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz
US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer

Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley

Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio
MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI "

Press Release for Immediate Release

Read more...

Iviewit Founder and Inventor Eliot Bernstein Files SEC Complaint on Trillion Dollar Patent Liability.

"" Introduction – background info

I, Eliot Bernstein, of 2753 NW 34th Street, Boca Raton, Florida 33434, as one of the Original Owners and Inventors of revolutionary "backbone technologies" that transformed digital video and imaging, am filing this FORMAL COMPLAINT with the SEC and all agencies and committees addressed herein, against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, whereby these companies and all of their subsidiaries, affiliates, contractors, agents and employees collectively are referred to herein as (“Warner Bros et al.”).

Please note that these companies previously were under the same corporate structure during most, if not all, of the critically relevant times to this complaint.

This timeframe includes both the original merger of Warner Bros et al. to the recent breakup of Warner Bros et al. and the allegations levied herein may have directly, and illegally, influenced those transactions to the detriment of Shareholders.

Future detrimental effects on Shareholders, if failure to investigate these matters is not instant, may result in causing further massive losses to Shareholders of these highly traded New York Stock Exchange companies.

The losses could be thousands of times greater than the Ponzi Schemes of Stanford, Madoff and Dreier combined and those schemes evidenced herein have ties to the alleged crimes described herein.

For your convenience, I have attached the following link to a Press Statement issued about the Merger of Warner Bros et al. back in 2000[1].

In addition, I make a special note concerning the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of these matters predicated upon various factors, including but not limited to, the recent corporate split of AOL Inc. and Time Warner, Inc., which itself should be fully and completely investigated by the SEC as part of this complaint with direct correlation to the matters herein, for all of the reasons set forth herein.

The Investigation should, include but not be limited to, all original stock and securities related transactions in the original Warner Bros et al. merger and all transactions forward. All of these transactions dating back to 1998 may have been influenced by the alleged fraud and involvement in criminal activity described herein.

Leading Industry Experts working inside Warner Bros et al. (See attached Exhibit 1 – List of Warner Bros et al. contacts) and related companies, tested, used, viewed, approved, validated, Contracted and Licensed[2] my technologies under multiple Non Disclosures and other Licensing Agreements.

Attached hereto are various Internal communications within Warner Bros et al. documenting the relationship and admitted uses, including an ADMISSION by technologists within the organization, that my Technologies were being infringed upon AFTER NDA’s had been executed.

These agreements then resulted in a Signed and Executed Licensing Agreement at that time as illustrated and exhibited herein. Warner Bros et al. and others complained of herein may be perpetrating Massive Fraud on their Shareholders through concealment of these Massive Liabilities resulting from the theft and unauthorized uses of my technologies over almost a decade.

The technologies have revolutionized digital imaging and video hardware and software and instantly heralded by leading experts in 1998 as the “Holy Grail” of the Internet that allows quality video and imaging as now used worldwide by almost every user of a PC.

But broader than merely the Internet the technologies are used on virtually every camera, video camera, television, medical imaging device, telescope, microscope, satellite, DVD, graphics chip, gaming hardware and software, flight and space simulators, etc. and paved the way for new markets entirely, such as cell phone video and Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”).

Then it was discovered that our Intellectual Property Attorneys from Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley”) and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel LLP (“Meltzer”) with the help of early licensors of my technologies, including Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Lockheed Martin (“Lockheed”), Silicon Graphics Inc. (“SGI” ), Warner Bros., AOL, IBM and more, tried to grab the “Grail”.

When caught, as evidenced herein, these powerful law firms and blue chip companies resorted to terrorist styled attacks on the key inventor, including a Car Bombing and Death threats.

As I have attempted to pursue my rights and report their crimes, they have further resorted to a litany of cover up crimes in the courts and at regulatory agencies and again they were caught violating law and public offices over the last nine years in efforts to stave off prosecution for their crimes.

All of these offenses are subject to multiple ongoing State, Federal and International investigations and a Twelve 12 Twelve, 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit[3].

The Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit has been marked legally “RELATED” to a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of a New York Supreme Court Staff Attorney, discussed herein in under the section Titled “Discussion of Ongoing Lawsuits and Related Cases to Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson” .

Sony, Intel, Lockheed, IBM, Silicon Graphics and others are also complained of herein and all authorities this complaint is addressed too should investigate all those Defendants in my Amended Complaint exhibited herein, many for similar and identical crimes. ""

Full Complaint and Source of Post Click Here

Read more...

CEO of Intel Corp - Paul Otellini - Does he care About Iviewit and the Liability to Shareholders?

" Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson in New York September 2009

"" « September 24, 2009 Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner
Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Larnder, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More »

September 24, 2009 Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson NY: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, IBM, SGI & Lockheed Martin.

SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Senator John Sampson Chairman

SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

Monday June 8, 2009
NYC
250 Broadway
NY NY
10 A.M.
19th Floor

ORAL TESTIMONY BY INVITATION ONLY
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09
The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York

1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL

5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY

8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY

11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY

14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys.

Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed.

This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process. ""

Full Article, Source of Post and VIDEO Click Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159

posted HERE by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Read more...

Intel Stocks are UP ? Intel Corp. is Doing Great? What about a Trillion Dollar Unreported Liability?

Thursday January 15th 2004 - Are You Kidding ? The Media is saying Intel Corp. is doing Great - What a Crock that is .. look at their anti-trust lawsuits, proof of bullying Dell and Keeping Other Chip Makers Down... Intel illegally KEEPS competition out.. .. Intel has not reported a Trillion Dollar Liability and the Media Your Reading SAYS things are Great over there at INTEL... just like we knew they would be... Stocks are Up .. yee haw.. it is a Flat Out Lie.

Who is Making This Stuff Up and Can they READ?

The Reason Intel Chips are in High Demand is Because they Pay Off Companies like Dell, the fight off other Chip Makers and they Violate Anti-Trust Laws. Read the Links on this Blog and you will see that the Illusion that Intel is Doing Well is just that an Illusion - a HOAX.

It would appear to me that this HOT Stock Tip was Bought and Paid for as you see the Anti-Trust Lawsuits and all that Intel Corp. has been Up to and you can Easily see from the Information and links on this Blog that Intel has a Trillion Dollar Liability that they are NOT Disclosing to Share Holders and boy Intel Wants you to believe this Hot Stock Tip... I think it is a Flat Out Lie that CEO Paul Otellini has bought and paid for to create a false market.

Check out www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com and read the other posts and links on this site and way more to come on the Truth of what is going on at Intel Corp. and Don't Forget the Secrets that D. Bruce Sewell left with and how he got out of his Intel Contracts so quickly. Intel is LYING to you about their Success - they want YOUR MONEY - I believe you can read and that you will do your homework before taking this one HOT STOCK TIP from Reuters.com to get you to buy into a False Market.

Some sites say Intel Starting Season with a Bang, Don't these Reporters... these supposed news writers online ... don't they READ.. can't they google.. Intel is In Major Financial Trouble this year and not in the Millions .. not Even in the Billions but in the Trillions - Do your Homework - don't believe me... read and Think for Yourself.

If Intel Failing to Report this Trillion Dollar Liability has made other Stocks Rally, then this is all an Illusion and Intel Corp. should be Liable - where is the SEC - where is responsible journalism - has no one read all the documents on this stuff. Boy if it were my Portfolio I would get out the Ol' Spectacles and READ for Myself...

Article Below Talking about How Great Intel is Doing...

"" Intel beats Street view, bodes well for Tech Rebound

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Intel Corp's fourth-quarter results roared past Wall Street forecasts and it gave a bullish margin outlook on higher prices and firm demand for server chips, reinforcing hopes for a strong recovery in technology.

Hot Stocks

Intel, whose stock extended gains after rising 2.5 percent in regular trading, said on Thursday its gross profit margin in the fourth quarter rose to a record 65 percent. While it forecast a drop to 59 percent to 63 percent in the typically weaker current quarter, that still surpassed analysts' average projection of 58.8 percent.

"That will alleviate a lot of the concerns people had over whether the surge in buying at the end of the year was one that was going to peter out," said FTN Equity Capital Markets analyst Joanne Feeney. "That will have a positive spillover to other stocks" on Friday.

Some technology stocks rallied after-hours on the news. Intel chip rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc gained 1.7 percent, while Microsoft Corp climbed nearly 1 percent. Japan's Nikkei average hit a 15-month high, lifted by tech shares such as chip equipment supplier Advantest.

Many analysts predict a return of corporate spending in the second half of 2010 that would lift the tech sector out of its worst downturn in decades. Some say new spending has already begun.

"The big picture is that tech remains investable," said Wedbush Morgan's Patrick Wang.

"They're giving us reassurance that the PC sector remains intact and more importantly, that we're seeing incremental improvements in the economy and that we're probably well on our way to recovery."

"What they did on the gross margin line was extremely impressive, which was due to the massive upside in revenue."

Intel said average selling prices of its microprocessors rose from the third quarter, driving a 21 percent revenue increase in its data center business which makes server chips, and a 10 percent revenue rise in its PC business.

A BLOWOUT

Despite the blowout quarter, shares of the world's largest microchip maker were up just less than 1 percent in extended trading, after rallying 7 percent in the past two weeks.

The stock initially rose as much as 2.1 percent to $21.94 after Intel reported earnings.

"People had real high expectations going into this quarter. So they may be looking for other ways to play this positive move besides Intel," said Robert Burleson, analyst at Canaccord Adams, recommending other chip names such as AMD.

Chief Executive Paul Otellini told analysts on a conference call that corporate spending should return "modestly in 2010."

"What we are benefiting from in the second half of the year, and what we'll continue to benefit from throughout this year, is the extraordinary return on investment that is incurred by deploying new server technologies," he said.

And consumer spending will remain strong, analysts say.

"The fact that consumers came out and spent so much even in the midst of the recession is a signal of how important the PC has become to the household," Feeney of FTN Equity Capital Markets said.

As the economy recovers and the spending power of consumers and businesses in emerging markets such as China grows, Intel will benefit, she added. "Combine those things and you have a pretty significant demand driver for this year."

Net income totaled $2.3 billion, or 40 cents a share, in the three months ended December 26, beating expectations for 30 cents according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

That was many times larger than the net income of $234 million, or 4 cents a share, in the year-ago period when the company incurred a $1.1 billion write-down mainly because of an investment in wireless service provider Clearwire Corp.

"The gross margins were better than we had even expected," said Broadpoint AmTech's Doug Freedman. "We're encouraged by the low capital spending and the projection that gross margin would continue to operate within a very tight range."

Revenue rose to $10.6 billion from $8.2 billion a year ago, above the Wall Street target of roughly $10.2 billion.

Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, forecast current-quarter revenue of $9.7 billion, plus or minus $400 million. This exceeds the $9.3 billion average estimate of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. ""

Source of this Gibberish
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60D5XJ20100115

Iviewit, Eliot Bernstein, Bruce Sewell, Iviewit Technology http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

Intel SEC Complaint...

Intel (INTC), Intel Corp

Read more...

CEO Paul Otellini - Penetrating New Industries? Opening New Factories - Spending Billions ?

the 7 Billion Dollar Lie... Oregon, Arizona and New Mexico ... are you kidding .. how did Intel Get this kind of Money to Throw around...

Of Course they Believe in technology - they Steal Technolgy, they want your Investment Money - Intel is Above the Law and Squashes the Competition and NOW I think this news is a Flat Out Lie as we are Hearing that Intel is Not Following Through on this...

Intel Will Have Unit Cost Lowered because Intel Corp. is Patent and Technology Thieves and they are Monopolistic so they keep the Competition DOWN... way Down..

Can't See the Video Click on
Link to Video and Write Up on this...
http://www.cnbc.com/id/29125556

Intel CEOP Otellini

Read more...

Really? Is this the Story Your Going With - Intel has a Trillion Dollar UnReported Accounting Error - Think that Will Affect Your INTC Stocks?

"Stock Picks: Intel, Google, Morgan Stanley
What Wall Street analysts are saying about selected stocks in the news Monday


Intel Corp. (INTC)
R.W. Baird upgrades to outperform from neutral; raises price target

R.W. Baird analyst Tristan Gerra raised the firm's rating on Intel on Jan. 4, saying in a note that salesforce checks point to tier-1 PC original equipment manufacturers recently raising procurement estimates for the first half of 2010 on more optimistic customers' forecasts for the full year, in part on a rebound in corporate PC spending, with the adoption of Microsoft's (MSFT) Windows 7 operating system a catalyst. Gerra thinks this suggests a continuation of above-seasonal trends in PC shipments.

The analyst thinks Intel, the world's largest chipmaker, could outperform its peers this year, notably those with stretched lead times, as he expects lead times to come down in the second-quarter while wafer pricing could firm up in 2010. Gerra sees Intel posting earnings per share (EPS) of 66 cents in 2009, and raised his $1.40 2010 EPS view to $1.60 on 15% revenue growth. He also raised his price target on the shares from $24 to $26. "

Source Of Post... also the Internet seems to Be aBuzz Today with How Good Intel is Doing, What a Sham that Is... Also Note with this that as a "Monopoly" Stomping On Nvidia to Keep them Down, well this could affect your Intel Stocks, once the SEC, FTC and the Public at Large Make Plenty of Noise about this Unfair Competion, Anti-Trust Violations and Industry Bullying.

http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jan2010/pi2010014_824036.htm


Related Links
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=153698&cat=1


http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jan2010/pi2010014_552158.htm
Intel Corp.

Read more...

Continued Culture of Conflict and Corruption of Ethics Rules and Law - Intel Corp. Accounting FRAUD - a Trillion Dollar One..

"Continued Culture of Conflict and Corruption of Ethics Rules and Law Appearing in a Sothern District of New York Bankruptcy Court with Major Law Firm Davis Polk Wardell and others This Committee should take Notice of continued conflicts within the operation of Attorneys regulated in New York now appearing in the Southern District of NY Bankruptcy Court here in Manhattan in a recent Ch. 11 proceeding filed by Silicon Graphics Inc (SGI ) on April 1, 2009 where the Davis Polk Wardell firm simultaneously represents 2 of the 3 Equity partners who owned Real3d, representing Lockheed Martin and Debtor in Bankruptcy Silicon Graphics Inc while also representing the KPMG Accountants for Silicon Graphics who prepared the financials in the second Ch. 11 filing for SGI. Davis Polk Wardell also is simultaneously representing CIBC, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Telekom and others under Signed NDA with the Iviewit companies and me.

Real3d Inc, of course, is the company at the center and heart of the Iviewit Technology thefts as related above herein involving Intel, Lockheed Martin and Silicon Graphics owning Real3d where the Technologies were tested and used by Real3d Engineers who deemed them “priceless” while under Non Disclosure Agreements, Licensing Agreements and Strategic Alliance Agreements with Iviewit and me personally initially.

To bring the Conflicts into clear focus, the SGI Ch.11 Bankruptcy was filed just months after coming out of an earlier Ch. 11 protection proceeding and most importantly just 6 DAYS AFTER SGI In House Counsel Evelyn Ramirez was placed on express Notice of a Formal SEC Complaint that I had filed against the Intel Corporation announcing a possible and alleged Multi-Trillion Dollar Accounting Scandal to the SEC for Intel’s failures to report to shareholder in their annual report, Intel
the fact that they are named Defendants in ongoing litigation with certain risks requiring reporting as liability. Further, for their failure to properly account for the misappropriated royalties and costs of knowing infringement whereby reporting those liabilities is also required under FASB No. 5 and related accounting Standards14, also involving Intel and the Sales Transactions of Real3d involving both SGI and Lockheed Martin SEC Complaints were filed.

Thus, not only did SGI file this Ch. 11 protection just 6 days after official notice of involvement in a Multi-Trillion Dollar Lawsuit and accounting scandal thru Real3d Inc, but also the filing comes a few months after SGI had published information in business articles on the web painting a rosy financial picture of the company.

What the SGI Bankruptcy Filings in the Southern District of New York show is that Davis Polk Wardell lawyers are intimately at the Heart of SGI during all of the initial years of the Theft of my Technologies while at Real3d during 1998 while simultaneously DPW is representing Lockheed Martin, 2 of the 3 Equity partners in Real3d Inc where ALL of the Sales transactions are now in question.

To further complicate matters and add another layer of conflict, DPW represents the very Accountants KPMG that SGI is using in the sudden second Ch. 11 bankruptcy filing when one of the very issues at hand is that an Accounting fraud has occurred thus placing Accountants for SGI in Conflict with SGI and Lockheed YET DPW attorneys have remained to Shield and Block due process against all in blatant violation of Attorney Disciplinary Standards for representation of multiple interests and being Witnesses in litigation since officers inside SGI and Lockheed would have to discuss what was informed to the Accountants KPMG and what KPMG knows and more.

Thus, the hearing of any of these Contested Factual issues in the Southern District Bankruptcy Court or any tribunal, commission, authority or agency or other court necessarily forces the Conflicts to be addressed as multiple interests can not be represented by the same law firm yet such Culture of Ethics corruption in New York has allowed these conflicts to continue creating a wall of Title 18 Obstruction of Justice that prevents fair and due process in multiple proceedings since DPW has been permitted to represent 2 Equity partners simultaneously and accountants for an Equity partner where the various parties could otherwise proffer separate and independent statements, evidence, etc. but for the conflicts being permitted to continue.

Shockingly, despite having filed a Formal SEC Complaint against the third Equity partner of Real3d , the Intel Corporation and requesting an investigation of the Sales Transactions involving Real3d, SGI, Lockheed and Intel and alleging a possible Multi-Count, Multi-Trillion Dollar Accounting Fraud for infringement of my technologies and FASB No. 5 and other FASB violations, DPW continues on simultaneously representing multiple interests simultaneously before SDNY Judge Martin Glenn who has deliberately refused to even mention the Conflicts in Bankruptcy proceedings despite multiple oral and written requests to resolve such conflicts leading to a formal request for mandatory disqualification of SDNY Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn and oversight of the Bankruptcy judge and investigation for Title 18 obstruction and related charges.

I note for this Committee that according to published sources, the law firm Davis Polk Wardell recruited Linda Chatman Thomsen back to the firm on April 13, 2009 who was the former SEC Head of Enforcement who was ousted at the SEC over the $65 Billion Madoff Ponzi scheme failures.

I also point out to this Committee that April 13, 2009 was only 4 days after I filed an Emergency Motion in the SDNY Bankruptcy Court in the Silicon Graphics Matters on April 9 2009 referencing my Twelve Trillion Dollar alleged Accounting Fraud to the SEC against Intel.

More notably, the SGI Ch. 11 filing came on April 1, 2009 just 6 days after SGI received actual notice of my SEC Complaint against Intel involving Real3d and In House General Counsel Ramirez at SGI had notice of this complaint in the days before the sudden filing by SGI after just emerging from Ch. 11 bankruptcy protection months before and after previously disseminating a rosy financial picture for SGI until my SEC Complaint was filed.

What should be remarkable to this Committee and should have been addressed by SDNY Bankruptcy Judge Glenn upon the filing of my Emergency Motion on April 9, 2009 is that SGI paid out huge sums of monies, in the millions, to former Equity partner in Real3d Inc Intel, to Davis Polk Wardell, to a law firm called Ropes & Gray who represents SGI in the SDNY Bankruptcy along with DPW and who interestingly has Video and Digital related Patents in their names and have refused to officially affirm or disaffirm conflicts in the proceedings, and other large payments to the law firm Sullivan and Cromwell who is currently Joined as Co-Counsel with Proskauer in another SDNY District Court case involving the MPEG Patent Pool, creating an incestuous circle of intertwined conflict.

I note that my Technologies were under Signed NDA with hundreds of companies including Fortune 1000 companies and major industry players such as Credit Suisse, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Warner Brothers, AOL – Time Warner, Sony Digital Pictures, Kodak, Wachovia, AT&T and a host of others and that major wall street interests are impacted by these matters thus rendering the work of any future Task Force of this Committee and the work of the Committee monumental for both its impacts upon the financial markets and fundamental to maintain fair and impartial due process and the fair administration of justice within the NYS Courts and NY Bar.

Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Bankruptcy Corruption - Fraud

www.DeniedPatent.com

iviewit stolen patent

Read more...